- Title
- Ground control points
- License
- Not Specified
-
+ The original author did not specify a license.
- Abstract
Terrestrial ground truthing of land use has been carried out between 2016 and 2019. Land cover types classification is identical to mapping of land use types. For project information see www.la-foret.org.
see
Ferrer Velasco, R., Lippe, M., Tamayo, F., Mfuni, T., Sales-Come, R., Mangabat, C., Schneider, T., Günter, S., 2022. Towards accurate mapping of forest in tropical landscapes: A comparison of datasets on how forest transition matters. Remote Sensing of Environment 274.
- Publication Date
- Sept. 7, 2023, 12:38 p.m.
- Type
- Vector Data
- Keywords
- Category
- Environment
- Environmental resources, protection and conservation. Examples: environmental pollution, waste storage and treatment, environmental impact assessment, monitoring environmental risk, nature reserves, landscape.
- Regions
- Global , Zambia , Ecuador , Philippines
- Responsible
- fischer_r
- Attribution
- Ferrer Velasco R., Lippe M., Günter S., Jany C., Mfuni T., Rebuyas R.S., Tamayo F., Fischer R. 2023. Ground control point data of the LaForeT project. Thünen Institute of Forestry. Hamburg, Germany.
- Maintenance Frequency
- data is updated as deemed necessary
- Restrictions
-
Data are free for scientific and/or public use. Specific provisions apply for commercial use. Access for data download upon request to wf@thuenen.de. Request needs to contain project or intended use description.
- Purpose
Research data, shared for participating communities, researchers, policy and science.
- Language
- English
- Temporal Extent
- Jan. 1, 2016, midnight - Dec. 31, 2019, midnight
- Data Quality
Field teams were composed by two to five researchers familiar with the locally prevailing forest and land use types, together with local guides familiar with a particular landscape. They spent approximately six weeks in each landscape, following a standardized field protocol based on existing good practice guidelines. A stratified sampling approach was applied to capture the main forest and land cover/land use types in each landscape. These strata were identified by the expert teams on the ground, through related activities within the larger LaForeT project (e.g. scoping visits, key informant interviews, community workshops, participatory mapping exercises, household interviews, forest inventories). The delineation of relevant strata and the design of the field sampling campaign built on visual interpretation of existing satellite images (Google Earth imagery) or auxiliary maps. The teams covered every pertinent class with a representative number of GCPs, spatially distributed across each landscape. Cross calibration on land use classification was regulary carried out in the field and campaign leaders were present in all three countries to ensure harmonized asessment.
- Supplemental Information
LCT
LCT Tier 2
LCT Tier 3
LCT Tier 4
Forest
1
Primary Forest
11
Broadleaf reference
111
With natural disturbance
112
Early stage (0-5 years)
1121
Intermediate stage (5-10 years)
1122
Advanced stage (10-20 years)
1123
>20 years
1124
Not clear stage
1125
Secondary Forest Anthropogenic disturbance natural regeneration
12
Once completely deforested
121
Early stage (0-5 years)
1211
Intermediate stage (5-10 years)
1212
Advanced stage (10-20 years)
1213
>20 years
1214
Not clear stage
1215
SF-Swidden fallow, without fire
1216
SF-Swidden fallow, with fire
1217
Not completely deforested interventions
122
Early stage (0-5 years)
1221
Intermediate stage (5-10 years)
1222
Advanced stage (10-20 years)
1223
>20 years
1224
Not clear stage
1225
Forest Plantations Anthropogenic regeneration
13
Once completely deforested
131
Early stage (0-5 years)
1311
Intermediate stage (5-10 years)
1312
Advanced stage (10-20 years)
1313
>20 years
1314
Not clear stage
1315
Acacia Plantation
1316
Not completely deforested enrichment
132
Early stage (0-5 years)
1321
Intermediate stage (5-10 years)
1322
Advanced stage (10-20 years)
1323
>20 years
1324
Not clear stage
1325
SF-post extraction, without fire
1226
SF-post-extraction, with fire
1227
Other Forest - Not Clear - Add comments
14
Agroforestry
2
Agrisilviculture trees with crops
21
Rotated in time
211
Shifting cultivation
2111
Improved tree fallow
2112
Tagunya
2113
AS Spatially mixed
212
Trees on cropland
2121
Multiple use of trees in crop plantations
2122
Homegarden Mixed multistorey tree and crop arrangements
2123
Hedgerow Alley Intercropping
2124
Boundary planting
2125
Strip planting
2126
Chakra
213
Shifting cultivation
2131
Mixed multistorey
2132
Agrisilvipastoral crops trees with pasture and animals
22
ASP Spatially mixed
221
Trees planted on rangelands permanent pastures
2211
Tree crop plantations with pastures
2212
ASP Spatially zoned
222
Alley farming
2221
Living fence
2222
Boundary plantings, mainly for fodder
2223
Managed tree plots
23
Fodder banks using woody species
231
Fuelwood lots
232
Mixed orchards
233
Other Agroforestry - Not Clear - Add comments
24
Cropland
3
Perennial
31
Orchards
311
Others
312
Banana
3121
Cacao
3122
Coconut
3123
Coffee
3124
Oil palm
3125
Sugar cane
3126
Others
3127
Annual
32
Rainfed
321
Cereals (e.g.Rice, Maize/Corn, Barley)
3211
Fallow
3212
Intercropping
3213
Legumes
3214
Potatoes
3215
Tubers
3216
Vegetables
3217
Others
3218
Irrigated
322
Cereals (e.g.Rice, Maize/Corn, Barley)
3221
Fallow
3222
Intercropping
3223
Legumes
3224
Potatoes
3225
Tubers
3226
Vegetables
3227
Others
3228
Grassland
4
Woody grassland
41
Non woody grassland
42
Pastures
43
Lower than 1 TLU ha
431
Bigger than 1 TLU ha
432
Shrubland
5
Woody Shrubland
51
Non woody Shrubland
52
Wetland
6
Riverbanks
61
Marshland
62
Aquaculture Fishpond
63
Built up
7
Road
71
Railway
72
Communications
73
Building
74
Settlement
75
Other
76
Bare surfaces
8
Bare soil
81
Snow and glaciers
82
Surface rock
83
Water bodies
9
River Stream
91
Natural pond Lagoon Lake
92
- Spatial Representation Type
- vector data is used to represent geographic data